![]() 10/21/2018 at 15:22 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Notchback. Four-eye. 5.0. Manual. YES. The least mustang looking mustang ever created.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:03 |
|
Go for it while they are still cheap. I prefer the style from 86 -93 but they are such a great platform to build for cheap.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:04 |
|
least mustang looking mustang
Accurate.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:10 |
|
I think that distinction might actually go to the Mexican market Fox 'Stang, which used the front clip from a Capri.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:11 |
|
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:12 |
|
How can it be the least Mustang-looking Mustang if that’s what it looked like for almost half the Mustang’s history? The Mustang looked like that for 25 years.
The new one looks like an Accord :p
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:14 |
|
Because when people think of a fox body stang they think of a plastic headlight fastback.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:14 |
|
God damn it looks like such a grandpa car.
I love it.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:17 |
|
Oh. I
thought people thinking of one
thought of a pile of
rust :p
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:19 |
|
Mexico also did a luxury model with chrome trim and a vinyl roof
![]() 10/21/2018 at 16:57 |
|
The least mustang looking mustang ever created.
Um, have you blocked the Mustang II from your mind (like I have tried to do)?
![]() 10/21/2018 at 17:22 |
|
That’s awesome
![]() 10/21/2018 at 17:33 |
|
It’s horribly proportioned but at least the Mustang II still has muscle car styling cues.
![]() 10/21/2018 at 19:12 |
|
It all started with Musta ng I concept in 1962. It d oesn’t resemble other M ustangs very much.